Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Barry Stroud — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Barry Stroud
    Barry Stroud

    Barry Stroud

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    1935 – 2019

    Barry Stroud (1935–2019) was an American analytic philosopher at UC Berkeley, widely regarded as one of the foremost epistemologists of the twentieth century. He is best known for his rigorous defense and analysis of philosophical skepticism, and for influential interpretations of Hume and Wittgenstein. His work probed the limits of naturalistic philosophy and the conditions under which human knowledge is possible.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Authored 'The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism' (1984), a landmark defense of the philosophical importance of Cartesian skepticism

    2

    Wrote 'Hume' (1977), an influential systematic interpretation of Hume's epistemology and philosophy of mind

    3

    Developed sustained critiques of naturalism in philosophy, arguing it cannot fully explain the normativity of knowledge

    4

    Authored 'The Quest for Reality' (2000), examining the metaphysics of secondary qualities and color perception

    5

    Contributed foundational analyses of Wittgenstein's rule-following considerations and their epistemological implications

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Our belief in other minds is warranted, even if fallible, because it is grounded in the nature of our experience rather than in a faulty analogical inference.

    Consciousness & Mind

    claim

    Our belief in other minds is warranted, even if fallible, because it is grounded in the nature of our experience rather than in a faulty analogical inference.

    Natural Theology

    claim

    We can rationally believe both ourselves and God to be mental in nature from a practical point of view.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    We can rationally believe both ourselves and God to be mental in nature from a practical point of view.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    4

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Consciousness & Mind1
    Natural Theology1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant4 sharedAristotle4 sharedDavid Hume4 sharedBertrand Russell4 sharedPlato4 sharedRené Descartes4 sharedF. Schlegel4 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Consciousness & Mind→
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz4 shared