Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Moss — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Moss
    M

    Moss

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    Moss is a contemporary philosopher working in the area of formal epistemology and game theory, with particular focus on the interpretation of plausibility updates in dynamic and sequential decision-making contexts. Their work bridges technical game-theoretic modeling and philosophical questions about rational belief revision during actual play.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Analyzed the interpretation of plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play

    2

    Contributed to formal epistemology and the semantics of probabilistic reasoning

    3

    Advanced understanding of belief revision in dynamic game-theoretic contexts

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Bioethics

    claim

    Findings from association studies can contribute to the analysis of the condition itself.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Findings from association studies can contribute to the analysis of the condition itself.

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Skepticism1
    Bioethics1

    Related Thinkers

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    Aristotle
    3 shared
    Thomas Aquinas3 shared
    Alex Rosenberg3 shared
    John Dupré3 shared
    Kaplan3 shared
    Maureen O'Malley3 shared
    Michel Foucault3 shared
    Richard Dawkins3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→