Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Paul Davies — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Paul Davies
    Paul Davies

    Paul Davies

    contemporaryPhilosophy of Science / Natural Theology

    b. 1946

    Paul Davies (born 1946) is a British-born physicist, cosmologist, and science communicator whose work bridges fundamental physics and the philosophy of science. He has held positions at the University of Adelaide, Macquarie University, and Arizona State University, where he directs the Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science. His books, including The Mind of God and The Goldilocks Enigma, engage rigorously with questions of cosmic fine-tuning, the origins of the universe, and whether science can address questions traditionally reserved for theology.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Won the Templeton Prize (1995) for progress in religion and science

    2

    Developed influential popular treatments of the fine-tuning and cosmological arguments

    3

    Authored The Mind of God (1992), widely read in philosophy of religion curricula

    4

    Distinguished contributions to theoretical physics including quantum gravity and thermodynamics of black holes

    5

    Founded the Beyond Center at Arizona State University for interdisciplinary research on foundational questions

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Natural Theology

    claim

    Divine creative intervention is not causally necessary for the nonconservative appearance of new matter in steady-state cosmology.

    claim

    The cosmological argument does not rely on notions central to the ontological argument and, if sound, gives us reason to think that the necessary being exists rather than not.

    Causation

    claim

    Divine creative intervention is not causally necessary for the nonconservative appearance of new matter in steady-state cosmology.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Philosophy of Science / Natural Theology

    Topic Influence

    Natural Theology2
    Causation1

    Related Thinkers

    Aristotle2 sharedThomas Aquinas2 sharedAdolf Grünbaum2 sharedAlbert Einstein2 sharedGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedJohn Earman2 sharedPlato2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Natural Theology→See Causation→