Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Rodney Holder — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Thinkers/Rodney Holder
    RH

    Rodney Holder

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy of Religion, Science and Religion Dialogue

    Rodney Holder is a British physicist and theologian associated with the Faraday Institute for Science and Religion at Cambridge. He holds doctorates in both astrophysics and theology, and his work focuses on the intersection of cosmology, Bayesian epistemology, and natural theology, particularly fine-tuning arguments for the existence of God. He has critically examined probabilistic and anthropic arguments, applying rigorous evidential standards drawn from scientific methodology to theological reasoning.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Applied Bayesian probability theory to the fine-tuning argument for theism

    2

    Authored 'God, the Multiverse, and Everything' (2004), critically examining anthropic and multiverse responses to fine-tuning

    3

    Developed rigorous evidential constraints on probabilistic theological arguments, including the requirement to condition on total available evidence

    4

    Contributed to the Faraday Institute's interdisciplinary science-religion research program

    5

    Bridged astrophysics and natural theology through scientifically-informed philosophical analysis

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Natural Theology

    claim

    The objection that probabilistic arguments are only of interest when founded on all relevant available evidence is not a legitimate objection against confirmatory probabilistic arguments

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    1

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy of Religion, Science and Religion Dialogue

    Topic Influence

    Natural Theology1

    Related Thinkers

    David Hume1 sharedRichard Swinburne1 shared
    Adams
    1 shared
    Adolf Grünbaum1 shared
    Baruch Spinoza1 shared
    Bertrand Russell1 shared
    Ernan McMullin1 shared
    F. H. Bradley1 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Natural Theology→