Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Swinburne — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Swinburne
    S

    Swinburne

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy of Religion

    b. 1934

    Richard Swinburne (1934–) is a British philosopher of religion and Emeritus Nolloth Professor of the Philosophy of the Christian Religion at the University of Oxford. He is best known for his systematic probabilistic defense of Christian theism, arguing that the existence of God is more probable than not given the totality of evidence. His trilogy—The Coherence of Theism, The Existence of God, and Faith and Reason—constitutes one of the most rigorous analytic treatments of religious belief in the twentieth century.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed a Bayesian probabilistic argument for the existence of God in The Existence of God (1979)

    2

    Authored the definitive analytic trilogy on Christian theism: The Coherence of Theism, The Existence of God, and Faith and Reason

    3

    Defended substance dualism and the immortality of the soul in The Evolution of the Soul (1986)

    4

    Articulated a free-will defense and theodicy in Providence and the Problem of Evil (1998)

    5

    Held the Nolloth Chair at Oxford, the leading chair in philosophy of religion in the English-speaking world

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Natural Theology

    claim

    Divine creative intervention is not causally necessary for the nonconservative appearance of new matter in steady-state cosmology.

    Causation

    claim

    Divine creative intervention is not causally necessary for the nonconservative appearance of new matter in steady-state cosmology.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy of Religion

    Topic Influence

    Causation1
    Natural Theology1

    Related Thinkers

    Aristotle2 sharedThomas Aquinas2 sharedAdolf Grünbaum2 sharedAlbert Einstein2 sharedGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedJohn Earman2 sharedPlato2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Causation→See Natural Theology→