Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    William Lane Craig — Carmelics
    Thinkers/William Lane Craig
    William Lane Craig

    William Lane Craig

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Christian Apologetics

    b. 1949

    William Lane Craig (born 1949) is an American analytic philosopher, theologian, and Christian apologist known for his rigorous defense of Christian theism in academic and public forums. He holds doctorates in philosophy from the University of Birmingham and theology from the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, and has held research appointments at Talbot School of Theology and Houston Christian University. His work spans philosophy of religion, philosophy of time, and philosophical theology.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Revived and defended the Kalam Cosmological Argument as a rigorous philosophical case for a temporal first cause

    2

    Authored the seminal monograph 'The Kalam Cosmological Argument' (1979), generating substantial academic debate

    3

    Advanced a Molinist account of divine foreknowledge and middle knowledge

    4

    Defended the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus as a philosophical and historical argument

    5

    Contributed substantially to the philosophy of divine eternity, arguing for divine temporality relative to creation

    Positions & Arguments(3)

    Natural Theology

    claim

    Divine creative intervention is not causally necessary for the nonconservative appearance of new matter in steady-state cosmology.

    claim

    The cosmological argument does not rely on notions central to the ontological argument and, if sound, gives us reason to think that the necessary being exists rather than not.

    Causation

    claim

    Divine creative intervention is not causally necessary for the nonconservative appearance of new matter in steady-state cosmology.

    Trinity

    claim

    A truly solitary divine Person would not be divine.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    3

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Christian Apologetics

    Topic Influence

    Natural Theology2
    Causation1
    Trinity1

    Related Thinkers

    Thomas Aquinas3 sharedRichard Swinburne3 sharedAristotle2 sharedAdolf Grünbaum2 sharedAlbert Einstein2 sharedGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedJohn Earman2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Natural Theology→See Causation→