Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that 2 Peter 3:7 is a verse of Scripture by Peter
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Most scholars doubt Peter wrote 2 Peter due to language, style, and historical references suggesting later authorship.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
2 Peter was one of the last New Testament books accepted into the canon, indicating early uncertainty about its apostolic origin.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The epistle shows dependence on Jude and may reflect 2nd-century concerns, not 1st-century apostolic composition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
2 Peter 3:7 appears in all major ancient Greek manuscripts of 2 Peter with consistent textual tradition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The early church fathers cited 2 Peter as apostolic Scripture, treating it as Peter's authoritative teaching.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The verse's theological content and style align with the broader themes and voice of 2 Peter 1-3.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.