Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A beekeeper and orchard owner may fail to agree on the va... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The pollination externality between a beekeeper and orchard owner can be resolved by either party purchasing the other's property

    A beekeeper and orchard owner may fail to agree on the value of pollination and nectar

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Buying the other's property internalizes the externality by extending the firmEither party is free to buy the other's propertyThe pollination externality between a beekeeper and orchard owner can be resolve...

    Similar

    The pollination externality between a beekeeper and orchard owner can ...85%If a landowner refuses to sell, the threatening party is contractually...62%Ghate does not explain why the pig owner and the neighboring tribe cou...60%Instead, the owned thing (tomato juice) is lost rather than the unowne...60%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: public-goods
    View source passageHide passage
    However, at least in principle the owner of the first shopping centre can avoid this by purchasing the surrounding land before free parking is allowed. After Ronald Coase this mechanism for solving externalities problems is referred to as “extending the role of the firm” (see Demsetz 1964). Another example for this mechanism involves the public good pollination. If a bee keeper and the owner of an orchard cannot agree on the value of the pollination and nectar, either is free to buy the other’s

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective