Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A being who experienced different events could share sufficient psychological continuity with Adam to constitute the very same person on this criterion.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Psychological continuity requires causal connections between earlier and later mental states; different events break this causal chain.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Sufficient psychological similarity alone cannot constitute identity—two distinct people could share identical psychology without being one person.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Events shape psychology through lived experience; someone with Adam's psychology must have undergone similar formative experiences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Personal identity consists in psychological continuity (memory, personality, values), not in experiencing identical events.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Two people can share the same beliefs, desires, and character traits despite different life experiences, making them psychologically similar.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If what matters for survival is preserving one's psychological essence, event-differences are irrelevant to personal identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.