Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A being whose non-existence is genuinely possible cannot ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The First Being has existed without beginning and will exist without end, and has no potentiality for not existing.

    A being whose non-existence is genuinely possible cannot be said to lack all potentiality for not existing, undermining al-Farabi's modal claim.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If non-existence is genuinely possible for X, then X has a real modal capacity or potentiality oriented toward non-being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Al-Farabi's claim requires beings to lack all potentiality for non-existence, but genuine possibility entails some form of potentiality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Confusing logical possibility with modal potentiality doesn't resolve the tension—real possibility implies real capacity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Potentiality for non-existence and possibility of non-existence are distinct: one is metaphysical capacity, the other logical status.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A necessary being can have logically possible non-existence in other worlds without possessing active potentiality in its own nature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Al-Farabi's modal claim concerns intrinsic necessity, not exhaustive modal metaphysics across all possible worlds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Natural Theology1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    A necessary being can have logically possible non-existence in other worlds with...Al-Farabi's claim requires beings to lack all potentiality for non-existence, bu...Al-Farabi's modal claim concerns intrinsic necessity, not exhaustive modal metap...Confusing logical possibility with modal potentiality doesn't resolve the tensio...
    +3 moreShow less
    If non-existence is genuinely possible for X, then X has a real modal capacity o...Potentiality for non-existence and possibility of non-existence are distinct: on...The First Being has existed without beginning and will exist without end, and ha...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit