Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A being whose power is bounded by goodness lacks the ability to do evil, making omnipotence derivative of omnibenevolence rather than a primary attribute.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Omnipotence traditionally means power over all logically possible states; restricting it to 'only good acts' narrows its scope and makes it conditional.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A being that cannot do evil is constrained by its nature in a way an unconstrained omnipotent being is not, making the latter metaphysically superior.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Goodness can be a free choice only if evil remains a genuine alternative; necessity eliminates moral agency and the virtue that makes goodness praiseworthy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Logical necessity cannot constrain omnipotence; a being cannot do the logically impossible (e.g., create a square circle) without losing coherence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If goodness is essential to a being's nature, acting against it is metaphysically impossible for that being, like omniscience precluding false belief.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
True power is doing what one fundamentally wills; a perfectly good being willing only good acts has maximal, not diminished, power over its choices.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.