A being with literally unlimited power, knowledge, and freedom is not a limiting case of personhood but a qualitative departure from it, making simplicity comparisons category-inappropriate.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Category-inappropriate(as used in logic and philosophy of language): When you try to compare two things that are so fundamentally different in kind that the comparison doesn't make sense—like comparing the color blue to the number five.
Limiting case(as used in logic and philosophical reasoning): An extreme version of something that still belongs to the same basic category; like how an incredibly hot object is still in the category of 'hot things.'
Qualitative departure(as used in metaphysics and categorization): A change so fundamental that something becomes a completely different kind of thing, not just a more extreme version of the original.
Unlimited power, knowledge, and freedom(as used in discussions of divine attributes): The idea of having no restrictions whatsoever—being able to do anything, know everything, and make any choice without constraint. This is often used to describe God in theology.

Based on where you are in your exploration