Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A belief formed via a reliable probabilistic mechanism is justified even if the agent cannot articulate or access the probabilistic connection involved.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Justification inherently involves the agent's rational engagement with reasons—accessibility is constitutive.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Reliability alone doesn't ensure justified belief; a broken clock is reliable but doesn't justify time-beliefs.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Without articulable grounds, we cannot distinguish genuine justification from lucky accidents in belief-formation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Justification requires reliable belief-formation, not conscious access to the mechanism producing it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Humans reliably track probabilities in perception and prediction without conscious articulation of the process.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Requiring conscious access to justifying reasons sets an impossibly high standard most of our knowledge fails.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.