Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A bulimic person might desire to eat cake, and eating the... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Desire-satisfaction alone is not a sufficient basis for regarding an action as good.

    A bulimic person might desire to eat cake, and eating the cake would satisfy that desire.

    BioethicsVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsVirtue Ethics

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Desire-satisfaction alone is not a sufficient basis for regarding an action as g...Therefore, mere desire-satisfaction is not sufficient to make an action good.Yet eating cake would not thereby be regarded as genuinely good for a bulimic pe...

    Similar

    Yet eating cake would not thereby be regarded as genuinely good for a ...92%If intrinsic goodness cannot be ascribed to eating the cake, intrinsic...74%It is implausible that eating a piece of chocolate cake is good in its...72%Intrinsic goodness of an action is not a sufficient basis for rational...69%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: transcendental-arguments
    View source passageHide passage
    Consider this example. To rationally choose to eat this piece of chocolate cake, I must think that eating the cake is good in some way. How can I regard it as good? It seems implausible to say that eating the cake is good in itself, of intrinsic value. It also seems implausible to say that it is good just because it satisfies a desire as such: for even if I was bulimic it might do that, but still not be regarded as good. A third suggestion, then, is that it can be seen as good because it is good

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective