A coherent account of happiness cannot simultaneously treat an activity as constitutive of happiness and as subordinate to a single dominant component without equivocation on 'happiness'.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
(de Finetti's usage in the context of the Dutch Book argument for probabilism)
A subject is coherent if their unconditional degrees of belief do not permit a Dutch Book (a guaranteed loss through a combination of bets) to be made against them
constitutive(an alternative type of relationship the grounding relation might be)
Describes how something is made up of or formed from basic components that define its essential nature.