Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A coincidence (such as accidentally falling on the knives... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→When coincidences intervene in a causal chain, earlier acts in that chain are not considered proximate causes of the resulting harm.

    A coincidence (such as accidentally falling on the knives) intervenes in the causal chain between the gift and any resulting death.

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Related

    Intervening coincidences, like intervening voluntary acts, sever proximate causa...When coincidences intervene in a causal chain, earlier acts in that chain are no...

    Similar

    When coincidences intervene in a causal chain, earlier acts in that ch...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    80%
    The gift of knives was only a distal necessary condition, not a proxim...79%
    Intervening coincidences, like intervening voluntary acts, sever proxi...77%
    The proximate cause of the husband's death was the wife's voluntary ac...71%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: consequentialism
    View source passageHide passage
    One final solution to these epistemological problems deploys the legal notion of proximate cause. If consequentialists define consequences in terms of what is caused (unlike Sosa 1993), then which future events count as consequences is affected by which notion of causation is used to define consequences. Suppose I give a set of steak knives to a friend. Unforeseeably, when she opens my present, the decorative pattern on the knives somehow reminds her of something horrible that her husband did. T

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective