A consequentialist calculus cannot vindicate violent games by pointing to individual virtue-promotion while ignoring systemic cultural desensitization effects documented by researchers like Craig Anderson.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Consequentialist calculus(in ethics): The process of weighing up all the good and bad consequences of an action to decide if it's morally justified.
Craig Anderson(as a cited researcher): A psychologist who has conducted influential research on the effects of violent media and video games on aggression and behavior.
Desensitization(in psychology and media studies): The process of becoming emotionally numb or less reactive to something, usually through repeated exposure to it.
Individual virtue-promotion(in ethics): The idea that something helps a single person develop good character traits like courage, wisdom, or discipline.
Systemic: # Systemic Systemic means something that affects or involves an entire system rather than just individual parts. For example, systemic racism isn't just about individual prejudiced people, but about how discrimination is built into institutions, laws, and social structures as a whole. When a problem is systemic, it requires changes to the whole system to fix it, not just addressing isolated incidents.

Based on where you are in your exploration