Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A decision matrix that collapses all non-Catholic-God hyp... — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Pascal's original decision matrix is insufficiently fine-grained because the 'God does not exist' column should be subdivided into additional theistic hypotheses.

    A decision matrix that collapses all non-Catholic-God hypotheses into a single column misrepresents the actual hypothesis space.

    Natural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural Theology

    Related

    Pascal's Wager partitions the hypothesis space into 'Catholic God exists' and 'C...Pascal's original decision matrix is insufficiently fine-grained because the 'Go...Various other theistic hypotheses (e.g., non-Catholic conceptions of God) are li...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Pascal's original decision matrix is insufficiently fine-grained becau...82%Pascal's Wager partitions the hypothesis space into 'Catholic God exis...73%Pascal's Wager assumes reason cannot decide between theistic and non-t...72%Pascal's Wager fails because the same decision table does not apply to...69%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: pascal-wager
    View source passageHide passage
    5. The table should have more columns: the many Gods objection. If Pascal is really right that reason can decide nothing here, then it would seem that various other theistic hypotheses are also live options. Pascal presumably had in mind the Catholic conception of God—let us suppose that this is the God who either ‘exists’ or ‘does not exist’. By excluded middle, this is a partition. The objection, then, is that the partition is not sufficiently fine-grained, and the ‘(Catholic) God does not exi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective