Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A deductive argument can establish a conclusion that is n... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→If P3 is modified to say a deductive argument establishes a conclusion that cannot be false given true premises, then the supposition that the future resembles the past could in principle be established by a deductive argument from non-a-priori premises.

    A deductive argument can establish a conclusion that is not necessary provided the premises are true.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If P3 is modified to say a deductive argument establishes a conclusion that cann...The modified P3 does not restrict the premises of such a deductive argument to a...The supposition that the future resembles the past is not a necessary propositio...

    Similar

    It is possible for the conclusion of a deductive argument to be a non-...93%Rigorous deductive logic does not permit arguments to count as valid w...90%What is not a necessary truth cannot be demonstrated by any valid dedu...87%The inference from the premise to the conclusion is deductively valid85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: induction-problem
    View source passageHide passage
    There have been different interpretations of what Hume means by “demonstrative” and “probable” arguments. Sometimes “demonstrative” is equated with “deductive”, and probable with “inductive” (e.g., Salmon 1966). Then the first horn of Hume’s dilemma would eliminate the possibility of a deductive argument, and the second would eliminate the possibility of an inductive argument. However, under this interpretation, premise P3 would not hold, because it is possible for the conclusion of a deductiv

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective