Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A demonstrative argument establishes a conclusion whose n... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→There is no demonstrative argument for the conclusion of an inductive inference (e.g., that the next piece of bread will nourish).

    A demonstrative argument establishes a conclusion whose negation is a contradiction.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    The negation of the conclusion of an inductive inference is not a contradiction ...There is no demonstrative argument for the conclusion of an inductive inference ...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Hume's premise P3 holds that a demonstrative argument requires that th...94%If the negation of a conclusion is conceivable, no demonstrative argum...89%A demonstrative argument is one in which certainty is transferred from...87%Under the deductive/inductive interpretation, premise P3 asserts that ...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: induction-problem
    View source passageHide passage
    In Hume’s argument, the UP plays a central role. As we will see in section 4.2, various authors have been doubtful about this principle. Versions of Hume’s argument have also been formulated which do not make reference to the UP. Rather they directly address the question of what arguments can be given in support of the transition from the premises to the conclusion of the specific inductive inference I. What arguments could lead us, for example, to infer that the next piece of bread will nouri

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective