Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A desire unconstrained by external causes is insufficient for freedom if the space of possible choices was always causally or logically closed.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Freedom might require only acting on one's own desires without external impediment, not metaphysical openness of the choice-space itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Causal closure of possibility-space doesn't entail the agent lacks freedom if the causal chain constitutes their authentic deliberation process.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Requiring 'unclosed' possibility-space for freedom may be incoherent: any actual choice, free or not, closes alternatives retrospectively.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Freedom requires alternative possibilities; if all choices were predetermined, no genuine alternative existed regardless of desire absence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Internal desires alone cannot constitute freedom if the desire-formation process itself was causally necessitated from prior conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A closed causal space means even 'unconstrained' desires are outputs of prior causes, making the agent merely a conduit, not an author.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.