Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A difference in degree of control does not establish a difference in ontological status if both faculties share the same physical substrate.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Ontological status depends on causal powers and functional role, not merely shared substrate; different control degrees indicate different powers.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A single substrate can realize multiple distinct ontological levels; emergence creates novel properties not reducible to substrate identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Control degree differences may reflect structural or organizational distinctions within substrate that warrant separate ontological categories.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Physical substrate identity is necessary for ontological identity; substrate differences alone cannot create categorical distinctions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Degrees of control reflect functional differences, not fundamental metaphysical categories requiring separate ontological status.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Positing distinct ontological statuses for same-substrate faculties violates parsimony and invokes unexplained causal dualism.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.