Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A direct comparison between SDRT defaults and Gricean def... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    A direct comparison between SDRT defaults and Gricean defaults is not valid because they operate at different levels.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.SDRT defaults are formalized with respect to actually occurring discourse structures
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Gricean defaults are defaults for speakers' overall knowledge state
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Comparing SDRT defaults with Gricean defaults would not be comparing like with like
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Related

    Comparing SDRT defaults with Gricean defaults would not be comparing like with l...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Gricean defaults are defaults for speakers' overall knowledge state
    SDRT defaults are formalized with respect to actually occurring discourse struct...

    Similar

    Comparing SDRT defaults with Gricean defaults would not be comparing l...87%Gricean defaults are defaults for speakers' overall knowledge state77%Local defaults belong to grammar and lexicon rather than to semantics ...76%At the current state of theorizing and experimenting, we do not know w...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: defaults-semantics-pragmatics
    View source passageHide passage
    The main strength of this approach is that it is fully formalized and it allows for computational modelling of discourse that takes pragmatic links between utterances seriously and incorporates them in the semantics. Next, it also aspires to cognitive reality and although the cognitive reality of the particular rules can be disputed, the view of discourse processing that they jointly produce is highly plausible. Finally, as the authors often stress, SDRT allows them, for most part, to model disc
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit