Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A disposition triggered by believing R is a reason operates independently of whether R actually figures in the agent's SMS.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If R doesn't figure in SMS, claims about R's role in triggering dispositions lack empirical verification or content.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Severing believed reasons from the agent's motivational structure makes 'reason' semantically vacuous.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Normative force requires that reasons be accessible to the agent's self-understanding; hidden reasons fail this condition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Beliefs causally trigger dispositions regardless of their metaphysical status in other systems.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A disposition's independence from SMS preserves agent autonomy and avoids circular reasoning about reason-responsiveness.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Empirically, agents act on believed reasons that don't appear in introspective or behavioral records.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.