Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A distinct entity requires positive being, but evil is defined entirely by what it lacks, not by any intrinsic properties it possesses.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Pain, suffering, and malice have measurable physical correlates and neurological bases that constitute positive properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A 'lack' of compassion in a cruel act is itself something positive: an active intention or choice, not mere absence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The privation account requires appealing to 'good' as fundamental, yet good and evil may be equally fundamental or independent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Only things with positive properties can be causally efficacious or constitute distinct substances in metaphysics.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Evil manifests only as absence: cruelty lacks compassion, injustice lacks fairness. These are privations, not entities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If evil were positively real, it would require its own explanation and ground, but we only explain it by reference to good.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42