Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A divine act that forecloses all future good for a person is categorically incompatible with merciful intent toward that person.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Divine agents may possess moral frameworks where mercy involves necessary hardship that ultimately serves greater goods beyond human comprehension.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Foreclosing future good in one domain may demonstrate mercy by preventing worse outcomes or enabling redemption through radical constraint.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A divine act's compatibility with mercy depends on actual consequences and cosmic purpose, not merely on surface appearance of harm to the individual.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Mercy is defined by concern for another's welfare and desire to alleviate suffering or harm.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Foreclosing all future good for a person ensures maximal suffering and the absence of any amelioration.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
An act that directly contradicts the defining aim of mercy cannot simultaneously express merciful intent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.