Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A Divine Command Theory that does not ground God's commands in God's essential goodness faces the Euthyphro dilemma

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If God commands what is right because it is right, rightness is independent of God's commands and DCT is undermined
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God does not command what is right because it is right, then God's commands appear arbitrary
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Robert Adams' modified DCT grounds moral obligations in commands of a essentially loving God, making arbitrary divine cruelty conceptually impossible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God's essential nature just is the standard of goodness, then 'why is God good?' is a category error, not a genuine regress.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This collapses the Euthyphro horns: rightness is neither independent of God nor arbitrary, but constituted by God's necessary nature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Leibniz argued that God's goodness is not measured by an external standard but is itself the archetype from which goodness is derived.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A being whose nature is necessarily and essentially good cannot issue commands that are genuinely arbitrary, since arbitrariness requires contingency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, DCT grounded in divine essential goodness avoids both horns without conceding that moral facts are ontologically prior to God.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.