Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A divine mind would itself require grounding in necessary truths (e.g., logical laws governing its own coherence), making God explanatorily posterior, not prior, to necessity.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Logical laws might be constituents of God's nature rather than external constraints, making them dependent on God, not independent necessities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A divine mind could ground logical truths by being the only possible coherent exemplar of reason itself, reversing the explanatory direction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Necessity and divinity may be coextensive rather than hierarchical: God simply is the ground of all necessity, including logical necessity, by identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Logical laws (non-contradiction, identity) appear to constrain all possible minds, including hypothetical divine ones, making them conceptually prior.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God's thoughts must be coherent and non-contradictory to be divine, then coherence standards exist independently of God's will.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Explanatory priority follows dependence: what something depends on for its nature explains it; God depends on logical consistency for rationality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.