Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A dualist afterlife that cannot explain soul-body interaction during life offers no explanatory advantage over materialist resurrection accounts.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
The interaction problem may be unsolved without being unsolvable; incomplete explanation differs from zero explanatory advantage.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Dualism can explain afterlife persistence of consciousness independently of solving interaction; these are separate metaphysical questions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Materialist resurrection faces equal difficulties explaining personal identity continuity and subjective persistence across physical reconstitution.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If dualism cannot explain soul-body interaction in life, it fails its primary explanatory burden before addressing afterlife claims.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Materialist resurrection requires only extending known physical processes; dualism requires positing interaction mechanisms entirely without precedent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
An afterlife theory gains no advantage by positing non-physical substance if that substance's causal role remains fundamentally mysterious.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.