Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A duty to pursue an end entails a duty to adopt the beliefs without which rational pursuit of that end is impossible.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
We cannot have duties to adopt beliefs; belief formation is not volitional but determined by evidence and psychology.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim conflates instrumental requirements with moral duties; needing a belief differs from having a duty to adopt it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
This principle would generate counterintuitive duties: e.g., pursuing health might 'require' false optimistic beliefs we're not obligated to adopt.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Rational agency requires means-end coherence: pursuing an end without adopting necessary beliefs is performatively contradictory.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If we have a duty to do X, we have a duty to do what is rationally necessary for X; belief-adoption is often rationally necessary.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Moral duties presuppose the agent possesses capacities to fulfill them; believing what enables rational pursuit falls within our capacity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.