Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A feeling of determination to infer is a psychological compulsion in the mind, not a perceived power or necessity in the objects themselves.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Regular constant conjunctions in nature (e.g., fire causing heat) warrant inferring real causal powers exist in objects, not merely in minds.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If determination were purely psychological, predictive success of inferences would be miraculous coincidence rather than justified.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Shared agreement across observers about causal patterns suggests we detect mind-independent necessities, not just individual psychological states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Introspection reveals determination as an internal mental state, not a direct perception of external causal links between objects.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Different observers report varying degrees of felt determination for identical physical situations, suggesting subjective rather than objective basis.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Neuroscience shows determination correlates with brain states, indicating a psychological rather than object-inherent phenomenon.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.