A foundational assumption that survives every empiricalchallenge only through protective revision of auxiliary structure is not itself functioning as an empirically testable claim.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
protective revision(as used in philosophy of science)
When you change smaller supporting ideas to save a core belief that's being threatened by evidence, rather than admitting the core belief might be wrong.