Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A fragile vase retains its disposition to shatter even if never struck, meaning the causal law holds without any conjunction of events ever occurring.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Dispositions are fundamentally counterfactual: saying something 'is fragile' means 'would shatter if struck,' which requires possible scenarios.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Causal laws are regularities describing actual or possible event patterns; a law with zero instantiations may be vacuous or indeterminate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The vase's molecular structure explains fragility, but structure alone doesn't constitute a causal law without event relationships to ground it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Dispositions are intrinsic properties grounded in an object's physical structure, independent of whether triggering conditions occur.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Causal laws describe relationships between properties that exist necessarily, not contingent on actual events instantiating them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A vase's fragility explains why striking it causes shattering; this explanatory role doesn't require the striking to actually happen.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.