Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A framework treating non-existent persons' hypothetical a... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The 'right to an open future' framework should be rejected as the sole constraint on parental reproductive decisions.

    A framework treating non-existent persons' hypothetical autonomy as lexically prior to existing persons' reproductive liberty generates paradoxes non-identity theory exposes as incoherent.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Hypothetical autonomy(as used in ethics)
    The imagined freedom or self-determination of someone who might exist in the future, based on how we think they would want to live.
    Incoherent(describing whether moral responsibility can exist)
    Logically impossible or contradictory; something that cannot make sense or cannot exist at the same time as something else.
    Lexically prior(as describing the ordering of values)
    Something that comes first in importance or priority, like how 'A' comes before 'B' in alphabetical order; here it means treating something as more important than everything else.
    Non-existent persons(as used in ethics and philosophy of reproduction)
    People who don't exist yet—like future children who might be born depending on choices made today.
    Non-identity theory

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (as used in ethics)
    A philosophical idea (mainly associated with philosopher Derek Parfit) that says whether a person exists at all depends on specific circumstances—so you can't really harm someone by bringing them into existence, even under bad conditions, because they wouldn't exist otherwise.
    Paradoxes(the logical puzzles that Swyneshed's framework helps solve)
    Statements or situations that seem to contradict themselves or lead to impossible conclusions, even though they appear logical at first.
    Reproductive liberty(as used in ethics and philosophy of reproduction)
    The freedom people have to make their own choices about whether and when to have children.
    framework(Carnap's philosophy of language and logic)
    A structured system of rules or language that must be in place for rational discourse to be possible.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Rights & Liberty1 linkedBioethics1 linked

    Related

    The 'right to an open future' framework should be rejected as the sole constrain...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective