Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A genuinely designed system would not systematically preserve the historical accidents and phylogenetic baggage that organisms demonstrably carry.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Constraints are features of good design: working within material/developmental limits often produces elegant solutions unavailable to unconstrained optimization.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Evolutionary 'baggage' often serves multiple functions; removing it would break integrated systems. A designer might preserve it for the same reason.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.We lack access to the designer's actual goals or constraints; apparent inefficiency might reflect prioritizing robustness, evolvability, or other values over elegance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Optimal engineering minimizes inefficiency: a rational designer would eliminate vestigial structures like human wisdom teeth and appendices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Natural selection preserves functional compromises from ancestry; design would optimize each system independently without historical constraints.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Human vulnerability to back pain reflects vertebrate tetrapod spine ancestry, not what an engineer would choose for bipedal upright posture.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.