A geometric object can possess continuous or approximate symmetries that no discrete subgroup of spatial automorphisms captures exactly (Nozick's objection to structural definitions).
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Spatial automorphisms(as used in geometry and mathematics)
Mathematical transformations that rearrange the points in space (like rotations, reflections, or translations) in a way that preserves the object's structure.
Structural definitions(as what must account for behavior)
Explanations of what something is based on how its parts are arranged and connected together.