Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A God who designed a world with such natural evils built into its structure bears causal responsibility for those evils.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Causal responsibility requires either intention or culpable negligence; structural features enabling suffering ≠ causing specific instances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Natural laws enabling both flourishing and suffering may be metaphysically necessary for free will, moral agency, and genuine goods.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Responsibility attributions presume the agent could have done otherwise; God's necessity may exempt it from standard responsibility conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Designers bear causal responsibility for foreseeable consequences of their designs, whether intended or structurally inherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Natural evils (disease, predation, earthquakes) are features of creation's structure, not accidents or external impositions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An omniscient designer would foresee all suffering their design produces, making ignorance an unavailable excuse.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.