Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A good ruler will display restraint and moderation despite divinely mandated power.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Absolute power structurally corrupts moral character over time, regardless of prior virtuous formation (Acton; Machiavelli, Discourses I.42).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Institutional incentives toward self-preservation systematically override individually cultivated virtues when the two conflict.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
John of Salisbury conflates divine mandate with moral constraint, but historical theocratic rulers routinely invoked divine authority to justify excess, not restraint.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A ruler who defines the limits of his own moderation lacks any external check, rendering the virtue claim empirically unfalsifiable and practically toothless.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The king's ingrained moral character, formed through careful instruction, necessarily guides him to seek justice and respect divine dictates.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The king is defined by moderation in all his deeds and decrees.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.