Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A great democracy must either sacrifice self-government to achieve unity or preserve self-government through federalism.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Rousseau's general will theory holds that genuine self-government requires citizens to identify with a unified political body, not fragmented units.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Federalism structurally privileges local majorities, which can suppress minority self-determination as readily as distant central authority can.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The dichotomy between unity and self-government is false: unitary democracies like Denmark achieve both through robust deliberative institutions without federalism.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Madison's own Federalist No. 10 argues scale can enhance rather than threaten self-government by filtering faction through extended republics.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Self-government and unity are in tension in a large democracy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Federalism is a structural mechanism that allows self-government to coexist with unity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.