A habit of collapsing the distinction between what is true and what is useful to us constitutes a form of epistemic self-deception that Kant identified as incompatible with respect for rational nature.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Epistemic: "Epistemic" relates to knowledge—how we know things, what counts as knowledge, and whether we can trust what we believe to be true. It comes from the Greek word for knowledge and is used to describe questions about the reliability and validity of our beliefs and understanding. For example, "epistemic humility" means acknowledging the limits of what you can actually know for certain.
Incompatible with(logic and philosophy generally): Cannot exist or be true at the same time as something else; contradicts or conflicts with.
Kant(as used in epistemology and metaphysics): Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an influential German philosopher who argued that our minds shape how we experience reality, and that we can only truly know things as they appear to us, not as they are in themselves.
Respect for rational nature(as used in Kant's ethical framework): Treating human beings as the reasoning, thinking creatures they are—recognizing that people deserve to be reasoned with honestly rather than manipulated or deceived.

Based on where you are in your exploration