Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A justification of retributive justice that excludes debt... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Any quest for the justification of retributive justice must start with the thought that the core of the concept is deserved punishment, not debt repayment.

    A justification of retributive justice that excludes debt repayment as foundational therefore rests on a false dichotomy between two concepts that are actually hierarchically related.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Foundational(as the opposite of what cross-individual coordination is claimed to be)
    Serving as a basic starting point or fundamental building block from which other things are derived or built upon.
    Hierarchically related(as used in logic and relationships between concepts)
    When two things are connected in a ranking or layered way, where one is more fundamental or comes before the other, rather than being separate or equal.
    false dichotomy(as used in logic and critical thinking)
    A misleading choice between two options that seems mutually exclusive but actually isn't—like saying you must either love pizza or hate it, when you could just like it okay.
    justification(Third condition of the tripartite account of knowledge)
    The condition on a knower's belief that excludes mere luck — the belief must be held in a way that is appropriate or warranted, not merely accidentally correct.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    retributive justice(criminal law)
    The principle that those who culpably cause harm should suffer the censure and deprivations constitutive of punishment

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Any quest for the justification of retributive justice must start with the thoug...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective