Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A justification that appeals to existence as a net good therefore begs the question by assuming a symmetric weighing that the asymmetry thesis directly denies.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Begging the question requires assuming the disputed premise; arguing for existence's value need not assume symmetry—it may simply deny asymmetry.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The asymmetry thesis itself makes controversial metaphysical claims about value that independently require defense, not automatic acceptance as a baseline.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
One can argue existence has net good value while explicitly rejecting asymmetry on separate grounds, making the charge of question-begging formally invalid.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The asymmetry thesis holds that absence of pain is good but absence of pleasure is neutral, creating fundamentally unequal moral weight.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Appeals to 'net good existence' assume pleasure and pain deserve equal consideration, directly contradicting the asymmetry thesis's core claim.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Without explicitly rejecting asymmetry first, arguments for existence's value presume the very symmetric framework asymmetry denies as false.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.