Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A law's pedigree within a social practice of rule-following confers no moral weight beyond the contingent habits that sustain it.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Social practices embed accumulated wisdom about coordination; dismissing pedigree ignores epistemically valuable tradition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Stable rule-following practices create legitimate expectations and dependencies that generate moral duties to maintain them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Without considering institutional history, we cannot distinguish justified reforms from destructive ruptures of social fabric.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Moral authority requires justification beyond mere historical continuity; habit alone cannot ground obligation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Laws sustained only by contingent compliance lack the rational necessity characteristic of genuine moral norms.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Societies have reformed unjust laws despite their deep institutional entrenchment, showing pedigree is morally inert.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.