Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A liberty-grounding theory that permits conditions under which agents cannot exercise their owned capacities undermines its own foundational justification.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Owning a capacity differs from having unlimited exercise rights—capacity ownership can justify limiting use.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Most liberty theories accept justified constraints (e.g., imprisonment for crimes) without undermining foundations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The theory survives if constraints respect capacity-ownership; only unrestricted exercise capacity is denied.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Liberty theories ground rights in agents' capacity for autonomous choice and self-governance.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If conditions prevent exercising these capacities, the theory fails to protect what justifies liberty itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A theory cannot coherently claim capacities ground rights while permitting their systematic non-exercise.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.