A limit can only be identified by a cognition that already grasps what lies on both sides of it, so Kant's critical boundary-drawing covertly claims the very unconditioned knowledge it denies.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Kant(as used in epistemology and metaphysics): Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an influential German philosopher who argued that our minds shape how we experience reality, and that we can only truly know things as they appear to us, not as they are in themselves.
cognition(Interpretation of Kant's use of 'cognition' (Erkenntnis) as pertaining to meaning/intelligibility rather than merely knowledge): A semantic notion (on the interpretation described)
covertly(as describing how Kant's argument allegedly makes a hidden claim): Hidden or done in secret, without being openly admitted.
critical boundary-drawing(as Kant's main philosophical project): Kant's attempt to establish a clear line between knowledge we *can* have (things about our experience) and knowledge we *cannot* have (things beyond our experience, like God or the soul).

Based on where you are in your exploration