Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A merely fortuitous connection between a fact and an acti... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→To act in light of a fact that is a reason, an agent needs to know the relevant fact.

    A merely fortuitous connection between a fact and an action is not sufficient for the fact to be the agent's reason for acting.

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    An agent may act on the basis of a belief merely by treating what she believes a...If the agent does not know the fact, the relationship between her action and the...If there is a fact in virtue of which her belief is true, she acts in light of t...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    To act in light of a fact that is a reason, an agent needs to know the relevant ...

    Similar

    For a fact F to be a genuine reason for an agent to act, F itself must...85%To act in light of a fact that is a reason, an agent needs to know the...84%If an agent is guided by a fact, then the agent acts for the reason of...83%If F is not a genuine explanation of the action, then the agent's beli...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: reasons-just-vs-expl
    View source passageHide passage
    We noted above that most if not all accounts of acting for a motivating reason require as a condition that the agent be in some kind of epistemic relation to the reason that motivates her. And we saw also that a widespread view is that this epistemic relation is one of belief: for an agent to act for the reason that p, the agent must believe that p. It is this thought that led many to endorse the view that reasons are mental states (often as part of the “desire-belief” conception of reasons for

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective