Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A method that presupposes what it must establish as found... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Reinhold's philosophy is methodologically flawed.

    A method that presupposes what it must establish as foundational commits a petitio principii, rendering the entire systematic edifice epistemically unsupported.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Circular reasoning undermines justification because the conclusion's truth is already assumed in the premises, providing no independent support.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Foundational claims require grounding outside themselves; self-justifying foundations violate the basic epistemic principle of non-circularity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Systems built on petitio principii cannot convince rational skeptics, as skeptics reject the very premises the system presupposes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Some foundational claims (axioms, basic logical laws) may be legitimately self-evident without circularity, requiring no external justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Not all circular reasoning is vicious; coherence across a system can provide justification even if foundations aren't independently grounded.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim itself presupposes objective standards of valid reasoning, potentially committing the same circularity it condemns.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Circular reasoning undermines justification because the conclusion's truth is al...Foundational claims require grounding outside themselves; self-justifying founda...Not all circular reasoning is vicious; coherence across a system can provide jus...Reinhold's philosophy is methodologically flawed.
    +3 moreShow less
    Some foundational claims (axioms, basic logical laws) may be legitimately self-e...Systems built on petitio principii cannot convince rational skeptics, as skeptic...The claim itself presupposes objective standards of valid reasoning, potentially...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit