Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A methodological concern about unreliable data cannot be ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    A methodological concern about unreliable data cannot be dismissed merely because the field has moved to a new theory that abandons the old theory but retains the same methods.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The concern is about data collection methodology, not about the specific theoretical conclusions reached.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the new theory retains the same methods as the old theory, the methodological concern applies equally to the new theory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    If the new theory retains the same methods as the old theory, the methodological...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The concern is about data collection methodology, not about the specific theoret...

    Similar

    The methodological concern about unreliable data is logically independ...91%If the new theory retains the same methods as the old theory, the meth...80%Phillips denies that unreliable data has damaged or held back generati...79%Phillips is either asserting the surprising claim that generative theo...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: linguistics
    View source passageHide passage
    Either Phillips is fronting the surprising opinion that generative theorizing has never been led down the wrong track by demonstrably unreliable data, or he is changing the subject. And unless clear criteria are established for what counts as “damage” and “holding back,” Phillips is not offering any testable hypothesis about data collection methodology. For example, Phillips discounts the observation of Schütze (1996) that conflicting judgments of relative unacceptability of violations of two li
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit