Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A mode is a way that extension manifests itself, or a pro... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Treating motion and body as equally fundamental rather than deriving one from the other cannot fully resolve the circularity in Descartes' definitions.

    A mode is a way that extension manifests itself, or a property of extension (Pr I 53).

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility2 linkedTruth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Descartes explicitly deems motion to be a 'mode' of extension, which is a lesser...If motion is ontologically subordinate to extension, then motion and body cannot...Treating motion and body as equally fundamental rather than deriving one from th...

    Similar

    Therefore, F ≠ G implies the extension of F ≠ the extension of G.82%Representing is not a mode of extension and therefore cannot modify an...82%Descartes explicitly deems motion to be a 'mode' of extension, which i...81%What is required is only that the mode associated with 'Hesperus' diff...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: descartes-physics
    View source passageHide passage
    Nevertheless, Descartes’ hypothesis of motion may sanction a species of relative motion, since his phrase, “considered at rest”, implies that the choice of which bodies are at rest or in motion is purely arbitrary. According to the “relational” theory (or at least the more strict versions of relationism), space, time, and motion are just relations among bodies, and not separately existing entities or properties that are in any way independent of material bodies. Motion only exists as a “relative

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective