Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A morally perfect God may permissibly allow evil if doing so is necessary to actualize a world containing significantly free creatures capable of moral good.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Natural evils (diseases, earthquakes) don't require free will to occur; a perfect God could eliminate them without compromising freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An all-knowing God permitting predictable horrors suggests either imperfection, indifference, or that the justification is implausible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Infinite beings might actualize both free creatures AND better worlds; our inability to conceive this doesn't prove it's impossible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Genuine moral agency requires the real possibility of choosing wrongly; predetermined goodness is not truly virtuous.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A world with free creatures capable of moral growth and love contains greater intrinsic value than one without such possibility.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
An omnipotent being cannot create logical contradictions, including free creatures who cannot possibly do evil.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.